Monday, October 22, 2007

special request by my brother, lky. he type it and asked me to post it here. anyway, here we go.

wong xinyi,

i think you and i are really a great match. you possess the quality of a man (highly egoistic) while i possess the quality of a woman (bitchy). dun say that "i don't really care" when you are actually so bothered by what everyone is quarreling about now. cox i do really care about what everyone is quarreling about now.

get ur facts rite. jm and jem didn't really call you a bitch and say that you are hard to get. they are merely typing out what i told. ya, i admit i am wrong and very UN-gentlemanly to call you a bitch, but sadly, i am not going to apologise. you always say we are still harping over stuff that happen last year, may i ask, what stuff? wat thing about you is so worth talking about now even though it happened 1 year ago. is it the issue of rejection despite the money and effort spent? oh come on, if that is the case, 50bucks is just too little to worth the mention. i should have ask more.

jm is indeed in the WRONG to keep mentioning in his blog about this issue. he piss me off too. maybe somehow you have forgotten you are the cause of all these shit here, while your friend who didn't get his facts rite add oil to fire. you must be wondering now that i am bull-shitting, pushing all the blame to you and your friend, but no. i think both parties are in the wrong. but i am just like any other human beings, depsite being wrong too, i prefer to argue that the other party is more to blame. isn't that what everyone is doing? you people think we are petty guys. we organise bbq, if you dun come we will be angry.

but hey, get ur facts rite again, how did you reply? did you say hey i am not interested or i cannot make it or i dun wanna come? no...it was an unfriendly reply. not once but twice. we organise a bbq few months back, jm sms you, you told us you cannot make it. we were fine. but if i am not wrong, you will come if one of us is to ask you again. because you actually can make it and you reply us cannot, and so if you are to tell us you can again, wong xinyi is so NO FACE. recent bbq, jw sent the "INVITATION" to you, you told her you will consider if ask personally, may i know, what VIP position do you hold? do we need to send out special bbq invitation to everyone we are asking to join us. is getting jw to ask so so so UNGLAM for you if you turn up. i mean we know you have plans with that gay and ur friends. but hey, we were polite and look forward to your group joining us for a bbq, that is not exactly the reply we want, no jiu no, dun say you will consider if only ask personally.

did i mislead any facts? if so do corret me. if you dun understand what i am talking about all along, in summary, you just need to know you are just too egoistic and "high-class". and anyone who has temper will feel fed up. jm sucks. jm blog it out. he is wrong. but is he entirely wrong if you has not given him the chance to blog about. jem is wrong. he blog what i told him. hard to get. they are both wrong, they blog what i told them. hard to get bitch. dun ever think about me apologising for those harsh and un-gentlemanly words. if somehow you forget how all these shit happen, i hope this will remind you. talking about what trying to maintain friendship last year, it takes 2 hands to clap. always waiting for things to happen will take us no where. totally bullshit and nonsense. again, i am not going to apologise for those empty promises. i am lucky we are not friends though. lastly, do give polite replies if we ask politely.

as for lianghao, if you think ur suanings are so capable, i look forward to more. keeping silence doesn't mean we dun care. your posts have been interesting. maybe you should really apologise to dk. he was being fair. you took that for granted. but if you dun wan to also nvm. up to you. but do get ur facts rite before you start blogging everything. ur friend, wong xinyi is to blame. well, that is what i think. i dun need others to think the same as me. liang hao, if you have the guts to blog, have the guts to look at us, dun be such a coward and avoid here and there. if you dun have the guts to look at us, think about how you blog so well, maybe you even dare to stare at us.

that's all, jeremy lim peace out.

No comments: